Question: If everything is meaningless, why do you write a book?

Question:

At the moment I'm reading ''Nichts muss sich ändern'' for the second time and find it even more fascinating this time round. But as I just read the passage where you explain one of the reasons for the book is to direct politics towards the third reality, I had some thoughts! Here comes for me the fascinating dilema. The conundrum that all of this is meaningless and in fact non-existent so why does anyone need to steer politics in any direction, write a book for that matter or do anything at all? Why even mention that in 85 years (which is in the future and therefore doesn't exist) 28 billion non-existent beings will populate a planet which is just a figment of those non-existent beings imagination? Why am I even writing this mail????

Answer:

You asked  a smart question.
Yes in deed: You needn’t to push anything in a certain direction. Yes in deed: Everything is meaningless. But things are happening anyway.
You are writing this email because…. you are not writing it. IT writes it through you.

Anything is done through us. Everyone is innocent in what he is doing or thinking. Mahatma Gandhi did not need to do anything but it did it through him. Hitler did not need to do anything but it did it through him. Neither Hitler nor Gandhi needn’t to do what they did. But it was done through them.
We are all avatars in a video game where there is no meaning or purpose in anything, but the video game is running anyway.

Even Martin Luther Kings fight for the black people’s rights was not necessary, it was perfect before it, it was perfect after it. Life was perfect before the Tsunami - it was perfect after the Tsunami. But the Tsunami happens anyway.
Me writing about a possible goal in politics, or you writing me this email comes through the same Source as the Tsunami. But it’s not necessary.

There is this illusion of cause and effect. There is a cause “putting guard-rails on the side of a street” and the apparent effect “Now we have less mortal accidents along the road”. When there is no time, there can be no cause and effect. Since the cause must have happened in something that is called “past” and past does not exist. But all of that that exists as a thought in our mind, in order that we can think the flat-world really exists. The bridge wants to experience a flat-world.

So if I mention in my book a possible direction where politics could orient in the future, this is given to me by the same Source that might let read this someone else, who then acts on it. But in fact 1) he didn’t act. The apparent cause (Me writing this) is the Source, the apparent effect (Someone reacting on it) is also the Source. And, 2) like in a video game, it is not necessary to act. It is not necessary to do or to change whatsoever in this virtual video-game.

But the video-game continues to run anyway. Without purpose, without meaning, without any need to change anything – change happens.

If there are in 85 years 18 Billion or 4 Billion people on the planet has no meaning – but we will have a certain amount of people anyway. There is no future (From the bridge perspective) and there is a future (from the flat-world perspective)

It is acting through us – without any deeper meaning – and it will always act through us– without any deeper meaning. Acting doesn’t stop. The apparent cause and effect doesn’t stop, the apparent time doesn’t stop. Things are happening anyway.

Even after enlightenment people will still construct roads – even though it is not necessary.